基于随机物理过程扰动的BMJ积云参数化方案对降水集合预报的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京信息工程大学 气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,江苏 南京 210044

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Impacts of the stochastically perturbed BMJ cumulus parameterization scheme on the convective-permitted ensemble forecasts
Author:
Affiliation:

Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast &Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science &Technology, Nanjing 210044,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    基于ARPS模式和随机物理过程参数化扰动(stochastically perturbed parameterization)方法,通过10个2018年6月至7月间的降水个例,讨论了不同的参数化扰动方式对BMJ积云降水参数化方案的降水预报的影响。扰动方式包括扰动BMJ方案的温湿倾向和扰动BMJ方案的温湿参考廓线。试验的结果表明BMJ方案在华东区域的降水预报中存在湿偏差,即预报降水事件大幅多于相应的观测事件。这一偏差在系统性调湿参考廓线后仍然存在。BMJ方案对不同扰动方式的响应存在较大差异。扰动BMJ方案的温湿倾向对降水预报的影响较小,且集合离散度低。扰动BMJ方案的温湿参考廓线对降水预报影响显著,能够大幅增加集合离散度,其中对称的BMJ参考廓线扰动对预报技巧评分改进有限,原因是小雨的湿偏差有所增加,而非对称的BMJ参考廓线扰动(扰动均值>1.0)能够有效提高预报技巧评分并降低湿偏差。此外,非对称扰动大幅改善了BMJ降水预报初期(0~3h)的空间分布形态,并且改进了夜间降水预报的强度。非对称扰动评分较高的原因是减少了原BMJ方案在降水预报初期的的大范围虚假预报,避免了大气湿度的大范围下降,保障了预报后期的强降水预报能力。而BMJ方案温湿倾向量级较小则是造成倾向扰动方法效果不明显的重要原因。

    Abstract:

    The impacts of stochastic tendency perturbations and stochastic parameter perturbations on the precipitation ensemble forecasts with the Betts-Miller-Janji? (BMJ) scheme were investigated. Both stochastic perturbation approaches were implemented on the advanced regional prediction system (ARPS). Precipitation ensemble forecasts were evaluated using 10 cases occurred in eastern China in June 2018 and July 2018. The tendency perturbations involved the temperature and specific humidity tendencies from the BMJ scheme, while the parameter perturbations were applied in the temperature and specific humidity reference profiles of the BMJ scheme. The results showed that the precipitation forecasts using the BMJ scheme were featured by wet bias at examined thresholds, meaning more forecast precipitation events than the corresponding observations. The bias issue remained after using wetter reference profiles. The responses of the BMJ scheme to stochastic approaches substantially differ. The tendency perturbations had little impact on the BMJ precipitation forecasts as the forecast precipitation frequency did not significantly changed, compared with the unperturbed BMJ scheme. The ensemble spread is low in the case of using tendency perturbations. By contrast, perturbing the reference profiles had great impacts on the precipitation ensemble forecasts. Symmetric perturbations of reference profiles produced large ensemble spread, but this approach also increased the wet bias at light rain thresholds and yield small improvement on the forecast skill scores. Compared to tendency perturbation approach, asymmetric perturbations (the perturbation mean > 1.0) of reference profiles were conducive to larger ensemble spread, higher forecast skill scores, and smaller wet bias, although the wet bias at large precipitation thresholds became larger. Moreover, the asymmetric perturbations substantially improved the precipitation spatial distribution in early forecast stage (0 h ~ 3 h) and the nocturnal precipitation intensity. The large area of spurious precipitation yielded by the BMJ scheme in early stage of forecast substantially dried the air, which suppressed the precipitation intensity in subsequent forecast. The asymmetric perturbations effectively reduced the spurious precipitation and improved the precipitation intensity forecast. The quantities of temperature and specific humidity tendencies were small, which was likely the cause of small impact of tendency perturbations on the BMJ scheme.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-30
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-14
  • 录用日期:2020-10-14
  • 在线发布日期:

地址:江苏南京,宁六路219号,南京信息工程大学    邮编:210044

联系电话:025-58731158    E-mail:xbbjb@nuist.edu.cn    QQ交流群号:344646895

大气科学学报 ® 2020 版权所有  技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司